| Page 46-50/Index / Home / | Next page | Previous page |
|
Has anyone yet become clean "from all your sins … before the LORD"? No, not yet. On no day of atonement, (which is the 10th day of the 7th month on the biblical calendar), was anyone perfected. And if you study the sacrifices for days of atonement past, you will see that they were for the physical cleansing of the sanctuary from the contamination of Israel's transgressions. What happened to the transgressions? They were symbolically put on the second goat and carried into the wilderness – to await their pardon by Christ on the cross and to await their final cleansing in the eschatological day of atonement. So there remains yet a future day of atonement which will come when God will complete cleansing us from all our sins. In that day we will be perfected, at the last trumpet, in the twinkling of an eye.[1] For the great Jubilee trumpet will be sounded and we shall be free of our sin nature, and indeed, the whole land of Israel with us:
KJV Zechariah 3:9 For behold the stone that I have laid before Joshua; upon one stone shall be seven eyes: behold, I will engrave the graving thereof, saith the LORD of hosts, and I will remove the iniquity of that land in one day.
The Heart of the Gospel: Romans 3
Let us now turn to the heart of the gospel in Romans 3:19-31. The corrections that we discussed earlier in this book are implemented throughout the following translations.
Rom 3:19 Now we know that whatever the law says, it says to those with the law, that every mouth may be stopped, and all the world may come under justice before God.
The law brings
the whole world under God's justice. It is the law that
makes the world liable to judgment for committing sin. The
text says, "it says to those with the law", and not
"under the law" as most translations read. The Greek
Rom 3:20 Therefore by the deeds of the law no flesh will be acquitted in His sight, for by the law [is] the full knowledge of sin.
The text could just as well read "justified" instead
of "acquitted". However, I have put acquitted to emphasize
the judicial idea of the word. The second definition of
Rom 3:21 But now the justice of God apart from the norm is revealed, being witnessed by the Law and the Prophets,
The normal
application of the law's justice is when the sinner is put
to death to pay the penalty for his own sin. But the law
also teaches that a sacrificial substitute can satisfy the
penalty, making an exception to the precept that the sinner
die for his own sin. This extraordinary justice through an
atoning sacrifice is according to the law. Therefore, we
cannot say it is apart from the law's teaching. Indeed,
Paul says it is "witnessed by the Law and the Prophets."
The Greek insight here is that by
Rom 3:22 even the justice of God, through the faithfulness of Jesus Christ, to all and on all who firmly trust. For there is no difference;
Here "justice" translates the
first definition of
Rom 3:23-24 for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, having justice done freely by His grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus.
The text is plain once the key phrase is corrected to the actual meaning of the Greek: having justice done. In the light of the context Paul is speaking of justice apart from the works of the law. Therefore, it is unlikely that he has made righteous in mind, because the deeds of the law are connected with our sanctification. Nor is it likely that he means declared righteous, because such a declaration could not be apart from the obeying the law.[4]
Rom 3:25 whom God set forth [as] a propitiation by His blood, through the faith, to demonstrate His justice, because in His forbearance God had passed over the sins that were previously committed,
The word "propitiation" means "atonement". Atonement is from the Hebrew word kippur which means to "wipe away"[5]. In this context the penalty is wiped away by substitutionary sacrifice. It is possible that instead of "the faith" the text should read "through faithfulness" meaning Christ's faithfulness. Otherwise, "the faith" refers to biblical religion by itself. The last phrase about the sins "passed over" refers to the transgressions of Israel which were put on the head of the scapegoat on Yom Kippur and sent into the wilderness. These transgressions were put out of the way so that Israel could have relief in the promise that God would dispose of them. The penalty for the transgressions was suspended or "passed over" by God until Christ atoned for them.[6]
Rom 3:26 to demonstrate at the present time His justice, that He might be just and the one doing justice to one by the faithfulness of Jesus.
Rom 3:27-29 Where [is] boasting then? It is excluded. By what law? Of works? No, but by the law of faithfulness. Therefore we conclude that a man has justice done by faithfulness apart from the deeds of the law.
This is the passage where the famous "justified by faith" phrase used in the creeds comes from. But we know what it means now--God's "justice-is-applied by [Christ's] faithfulness," or to use more lexical language, a man satisfies justice by the faithfulness of Christ. And this faithfulness is apart from the man's deeds of the law. By no means does the phrase mean "declared righteous by [our] faith or faithfulness apart from the deeds of the law". James makes it quite clear that Abraham was counted righteous because of his works. What Paul speaks of is the justice of Christ's sacrifice being imputed to our account without our works.
Rom 3:29-31 Or [is He] the God of the Jews only? [Is He] not also the God of the Gentiles? Yes, of the Gentiles also, since [there is] one God who will have justice done to the circumcised by faithfulness and the uncircumcised through the faith. Do we then make void the law through the faith? Certainly not! On the contrary, we establish the law.
Paul can justly say that he upholds the law, or Torah and Prophets in every way. He has not allowed the sinner to be acquitted. He has not allowed our works to be part of the atonement. Nor has he declared the wicked righteous, but his teaching centers around God's justice being done to the sinner in Christ by his substitutionary sacrifice. And Paul has established his thesis that the just shall live by faithfulness, which means Christ's faithfulness firstly, and then it results in our faithfulness.
Navigating Romans 4
Romans 4 is an especially difficult passage in the English because it seems to contradict James statement that faith without works is dead. However, the misunderstanding can be corrected with the three Greek roots we have been discussing: (a) dikaioo, dikaiosune, (b) pisteuo, pistis, (c) nomos.
Rom 4:1-3 What then shall we say that Abraham our father has found according to the flesh? For when Abraham was just by works, he has [something] to boast about, but not before God. For what does the Scripture say? "Abraham firmly trusted in[7] God, and it was accounted to him for righteousness."
Abraham, or any other believer is entitled to feel good about good works. Indeed, Paul even goes so far as to suggest that Abraham could boast (he does not say Abraham did boast). He only denies that Abraham can boast to God. Why does Paul say this? Because Abraham firmly trusted in God. Now if you trust in God, then you entrust your life to him, and he becomes the source of your righteousness. If God gives it to us, then how can we boast to God? It wouldn't make any sense to boast back to the Father after he has given you a gift. To firmly trust in God means the same thing as to rely on God. That's why Abraham could not take credit for his righteousness to God. Because God gets the ultimate credit. Abraham is crediting God as his Saviour and Sustainer by trusting in Him. And that is why God was willing to recognize his trust as righteousness.
Rom 4:4-6 Now to him who earns[8], the wages are not counted as grace but as debt. But to him who does not earn, but faithfully trusts on Him who does justice to the ungodly, His faithfulness is reckoned for justice, just as David also describes the blessedness of the man to whom God imputes justice[9] apart from works: In the context, Paul speaks of the one who works toward an acquittal of his sin rather than seeking the pardon provided by Christ's faithfulness. Such a person thinks that God will "justify the ungodly" and [1] 1st Cor. 15:52. [2] BDAG, pg. 249, 3rd edition, 2000. [3] It is hard to know which is more remarkable, the fact that the truth can be recovered in terms of the primary definitions of the words, or the fact that corruption and ignorance among Christian scholars has succeeded in suppressing it for so long. [4] Even trust in God is commanded in the law: KJV Deuteronomy 6:5 "And thou shalt love the LORD thy God with all thine heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy might." It is impossible to love God without trusting Him.
[5] There has been some debate over the meaning of this word. Typically, it is explained to mean cover while others explain it to mean blot out, or expiate. Recent scholarship has shown that the latter definition is correct by comparing kippur to is Akkadian cognate "wipe off" < kuppuru. The word cover does not quite explain the whole meaning of this word. English cover can leave us with the incorrect sense that something is covered over and that it still exists underneath. Substitutionary atonement or propitiation is directed toward wiping away the wrath of God, that penalty for sin. Animal offerings were often used for wiping away physical ritual impurity in the Temple or a penalty for sin. In the case of penalty, it is canceled. In the case of ritual impurity, it is cleansed away, not just whitewashed or covered. One mistaken idea one might get from "cover" is to suppose that the penalty of sin is temporarily "covered" by atonement leaving a further need for expiation of the penalty later. On the contrary, the penalty is wiped off God's books never to be found again. [6] The Temple Sacrifices atone for sins of ignorance, but not the transgressions and iniquities. No offering is made directly for transgression except the offering of Christ. [7] Hebrew "stood fast in" (Abraham's loyalty to God was counted as righteousness because it was righteousness to be loyal).
[8]
= do business, trade, cut a deal, work out a deal.
BDAG lists work for/earn under definition 2e,
page, 389, 3rd edition,
[9] = the justice of God done to Christ is reckoned to our account (he paid the penalty for us). Imputes means "counted".
|